NABC owner: Health department’s stance ‘legless’
The New Albanian Brewing Company (NABC) certainly appreciates the News and Tribune’s stance in “Cheers and Jeers” (Aug. 17 and 18, by editor Shea Van Hoy).
Van Hoy jeers the Floyd County Health Department (FCHD) “for its petty posting of a photo on its website taken in front of a local business.”
Unfortunately, petty is the least of it.
The photo, now finally removed, is defamatory and retaliatory. It testifies eloquently to a hubris-laden institutional culture in desperate need of instruction as to the etiquette suitable for taxpayer-supported government actors.
The source of my company’s current imbroglio with the FCHD is its misstep in seeking to require temporary food serving permits for beer pouring events. Moreover, it’s about the proper regulatory jurisdiction of the FCHD in relation to the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission (ATC).
Van Hoy writes, “The legality of such permitting can — and has — been debated,” and while this is true, readers may not be aware of the extent to which the FCHD’s legless argument has been demolished.
The crux is this: Who regulates NABC when it comes to pouring beer at temporary events, such as this summer’s excellent Bicentennial Park concert series?
The FCHD’s answer comes from thin air: Ignore both statute and precedent, wave a magic administrative wand, and declare without warning that henceforth, beer is food. Actually, no other county health department in Indiana currently is making this spurious claim.
That’s because seventy-plus years of Indiana regulatory history and all prevailing precedents indicate otherwise. As beer dispenser, NABC is governed solely by the ATC, and in the course of appealing the FCHD’s over-reach, we managed something the health department could not: We produced a court ruling clearly affirming our position.
In Fort Wayne v Kotsopolous (1998), the Indiana Court of Appeals clearly and succinctly confirms the ATC’s regulatory pre-eminence in Indiana. In short, NABC’s supplemental catering authority, as licensed annually by the ATC, is all we need to temporarily pour beer at Bicentennial Park or elsewhere — provided, of course, that we abide by the ATC’s guidelines … and we do.
The FCHD has absolutely no part in this permit process, and its attempted justifications to date have been arrogant, irrelevant and tortuous, reminding me of the way “The Economist” magazine once described a speech by the former British prime minister, Harold Wilson:
“It contained difficult passages in which it is impossible to disentangle what the words really meant to him from what they were intended to mean to others and what they might later be said to have meant at the time.”
Whether inventing baseless regulations or posting actionable photos, is this really the way we want county government to operate?
— Roger Baylor, New Albany
Local health officer upset with state’s tactics
As Clark County’s health officer, I want to make comments on the Indiana State Health Commissioner William VanNess’ recent campaign to improve infant health within Indiana.
Unfortunately, Indiana has above national average rates of premature births, underweight babies and infant deaths. We also have higher rates of teenage pregnancy, smoking while pregnant and drinking alcohol and/or using drugs while pregnant.
Clark County has a prenatal clinic operated by the Health Department that has done a great job of improving the health of pregnant women and their babies, with our 2011 prematurity rate at 4 percent compared to the state at 10 percent, underweight newborn rate of 5 percent verses the state at 8.1 percent and infant death rate of 0 percent (0 percent for the last 4 years) verses the state death rate of 7.7 per 100 births.
I am dismayed by the fact that while the state health commissioner campaigns to improve the health of newborns, infants and pregnant women within Indiana, he and his agency, the State Department of Health, has substantially cut state funding for six of 41 state-funded prenatal clinics in Indiana.
These cuts came at a time when the state had a surplus of greater than $400 million, when Indiana ranks at or near the bottom of the states related to the federal dollars that are sent back to Indiana for health care and when Indiana ranks 37th of 50 states in the dollars spent by the state on health-related programs.
The state health commissioner and ISDH cut funding for health department prenatal programs in two contiguous counties — Clark and Floyd — much to the detriment of uninsured pregnant women and their babies in our region. As a result of these cuts, the Floyd County clinic has already closed and is now referring patients to our Clark County clinic, although we have a limited ability to serve them.
I am critical of the state health commissioner for a variety of reasons. First, while he is campaigning to improve the health of newborn infants in Indiana, he and his agency are cutting funds to programs that are doing just that. Second, rather than cutting funding a small amount for all 41 clinics, he and his agency cut it substantially for six. Third, the grant application processes involved assigning points for the quality of the application, rather than the quality of the prenatal clinic program; the six clinics with the lowest points were not funded. Fourth, rather than campaigning publicly and aggressively to grow the ISDH capture of federal and state health care dollars, he chose instead to accept a cut in funding.
There is a disconnect between what Dr. VanNess says and what he does. Talk is cheap.
— Dr. Kevin R. Burke, Clark County health officer