David Camm may have suffered a major setback in his third murder trial, now that Indiana State Police have served up their most experienced technician in stain pattern analysis to dispute his claim that he got blood on his T-shirt by trying to save his son.
Late Thursday afternoon, Sgt. Dean Marks told jurors that expirated blood, coughed up or spewed, could explain the size and spacing of eight blood dots. But DNA analysis reveals the blood to belongs to Camm’s daughter Jill, age 5, rather than his son Bradley, age 7.
“In order to force blood out of the mouth, nose or a [gunshot] wound, the person would have to be alive,” Marks testified.
An autopsy found no blood in Bradley Camm’s mouth. During testimony last week, medical examiner Dr. Tracey Corey determined that Bradley died within minutes of being shot.
Marks told the jury his findings came after analyzed more than 140 photographs of the blood patterns and cutout sections from the shirt itself. Marks said he received the material in October 2001, three months before Camm’s first trial. His conclusions bolster the most critical evidence used to charge Camm with killing his wife, Kim, and their children on September 28, 2000, in the garage of their Georgetown home.
In 2006, Charles Darnell Boney, a serial felon, was convicted of the killings and is serving a 225-year sentence. But prosecutors maintain that Jill Camm’s blood pattern proves that her father shot her at close range.
“You have a better chance for back-spatter with a bullet striking the skull,” Marks said. “This is consistent with gunshot spatter.”
Marks’ testimony came after jurors viewed a videotape of the Indiana State Police interrogation from Oct. 1, 2000, that preceded Camm’s arrest. The interrogation concludes with Camm, on his knees, sobbing, after using a training mannequin to illustrate his attempts to perform CPR.
“It [blood] came out of his mouth and gets on the shirt,” Camm told Detective Robert “Mickey” Neal. “I’m telling you the truth, it happened exactly like I said. I did not do this.”
The videotape interrogation lasted more than two hours.
For almost forty-five minutes, jurors heard Camm recount that he had found his wife’s and children’s bodies in the garage upon returning home from playing basketball at his church. Neal and Gibson asked that Camm explain discrepancies in time frames.
But Camm’s lawyers objected when questions turned to his wife’s sleeping habits; they weren’t included in the transcripts provided.
When jurors returned from being excused from the courtroom, they heard Dartt explain the tape/transcript conflict as a technical glitch. When the tape was restarted, the jurors heard the tone turn from conversation to confrontation.
“You are trying to blame me for killing my children (sic) and my daughter, “Camm said. “I did not do this! I did not do this! I did not do this.”
“Did you try to clean up,” Gibson asked.
“No, no, no,” Camm responded. “I didn’t clean up s***, guys! That is your suspect! I am not your suspect.”