News and Tribune

Opinions

October 22, 2013

YOUNT: The great flu shot conspiracy

— The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has their behaviorist and communications specialist out installing fear and anxiety in the public about infectious diseases in order to promote vaccination of flu shots.

But the rhetoric about the risk of flu shots have been especially exaggerated. Example: The CDC will promote approximately 36,000 or more deaths in the U.S. will be caused by influenza each year. This is not true.

Three kinds of influenza viruses commonly circulate among people today: Influenza A (H1N1) viruses, influenza A (H3N2) viruses, and influenza B viruses. Each year, these viruses are used to produce seasonal influenza vaccine.

The 2013-14 trivalent influenza vaccine is made from the following three viruses:

• an A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus;

• an A(H3N2) virus antigenically like the cell-propagated prototype virus A/Victoria/361/2011;

• a B/Massachusetts/2/2012-like virus.

The CDC is recommending for those 65 and older a “high dose” quadrivalent vaccine containing two influenza B viruses; this includes the above three viruses and a second B virus — B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus. The scientific safety trial for this vaccine will not be completed until sometime in 2014-15, and so far, show no signs of improvement over the trivalent vaccine, but show more severe vaccine reactions, according to the CDC.

According to the Google Trends page, there were only 257 deaths from influenza in 2001 and 753 in 2002. The death rate from influenza averages 901 per year, and influenza is not a major cause of pneumonia.

You may hear health professionals attempt to justify the legitimacy of combining flu deaths with pneumonia deaths with the statement that “influenza leads to pneumonia.” The facts do not support this frequent, broad misstatement by health professionals. The American Lung Association describes pneumonia as having more than 30 different causes. Neither the CDC nor ALA know the specific causes of the pneumonias that resulted in death. However, they do know that influenza is not the major cause.

If you control the use of words and numbers, you can make trillions of dollars, and you can hide scandals that would otherwise take you down into infamy and prison. You can pretty much operate a whole sector of society and remain untouched.

Nowhere is this more clear than in the work of the CDC. The real name of that agency should be: Centers for Disease Information Control. That’s what they do. They manipulate words and numbers to present fictional images to the public, such as: wild falsehoods about vaccines creating immunity; suppressed information about toxic ingredients in the shots; the absence of proper controlled studies providing vaccines are safe and effective, etc.

But Peter Doshi, Ph.D., writing in the online British Medical Journal, revealed a new monstrosity. It’s all based on the revelation that most “flu” is not the flu. Follow this closely. If you blink, you might miss it.

You see, as Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the U.S. and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

This means most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies. So they don’t have the flu. Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases. The vaccine couldn’t possibly work. The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

Actually, most flu cases are “bacteria cases,” “fungal cases” or “pollution cases,” or “tainted food” cases, or “eating GMO cases,” or something else. But they aren’t the flu.

Here’s the exact quote from Doshi’s BMJ review: “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease:”

“But perhaps the cleverest aspect of the influenza marketing strategy surrounds the claim that ‘flu’ and ‘influenza’ are the same. The distinction seems subtle, and purely semantic. But general lack of awareness of the difference might be the primary reason few people realize that even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the U.S.

Of those tested, on average 16 percent are found to be influenza positive. “It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most of us, they can’t.”

Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu. So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.

Doshi points out the wordplay distinction between “flu” and “influenza.” But let’s go even simpler and say most of the time, diagnosed flu isn’t the flu. Period.

In an ethical world, medical researchers and bureaucrats would blow the whistle. They’d say, “Hey, we’re diagnosing huge numbers of people with the flu, but that turns out to be a meaningless term, because they don’t have an influenza virus. So they couldn’t have the flu.

Check this out on prisonplanet.com. Type in the search box “flu shots give you the flu.” This will bring up massive vaccine scandals, exposes and government lies.

At best, the flu shot could only prevent the “flu” in approximately one in 75 people that get the flu shot.

— Luther B Yount Jr. is a Charlestown resident.

1
Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinions
READERS' COMMENTS
Twitter Updates
Follow us on twitter